EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Introduction
This is a monograph on youth completed suicides in Hong Kong. Completed
suicides refer to those deaths caused by self-initiated destructive
behaviours. We do not intend to discuss those youngsters who express
suicidal wishes, plan to hurt themselves, or have unsuccessful attempts
to hurt themselves before. The latter groups are far larger population,
equally important, but they bear quite different characteristics compared
to completed suicides. Youth, in the present report, refers to those
age under 25 years.
The importance of having local data on an apparently universal phenomenon,
youth suicides, cannot be over-emphasized. It helps to document the
universal aspects and unique characteristics of youth suicides, and
hence an appreciation of the various factors behind the phenomenon.
In terms of service, relevant data suggest what strategies are applicable
or feasible in the local context.
Results
There has been intensive research efforts in youth suicides in the
past 2 decades in the West. Wide ranges of risk factors for youth
suicides have been reported. They include psychiatric disturbances,
family dysfunction, unemployment, exposure to suicides, probably genetic
predisposition and abnormalities in neurobiological findings, and
other psychosocial adversities. It becomes obvious that no single
aetiological factor is adequate to explain youth suicide.
Youth suicides in Hong Kong bear a number of characteristics similar
to that reported in the West. It begins to appear around early adolescence.
There is a clear cirannual rhythm with peak incidences occurring around
summer months. Large proportion of them are mentally ill and a significant
percentage has received psychiatric service in their past. The common
types of disturbances include depression, psychosis, conduct problems,
and substance abuse. Many age normative stressors, especially interpersonal
conflicts, appear to be the last straw precipitating suicides. These
precipitating stressors do not occur in random but seem to interact
with the pre-existing vulnerabilities. There are detectable clues
prior to youth suicides, like suicidal communications and previous
suicidal attempts. Relatively few suicidal youngsters leave suicidal
note. When they leave notes, they do write in lengths, try to explain
their acts, talk about their difficulties, express strong emotions,
and beg to be forgiven.
On the other hand, youth suicides in the territory have some features
quite different from that found in the West. The trend of youth suicides
in the past 16 years, fortunately, is not increasing tremendously.
The youth suicide rate is lower than that of the general population
. The male-to female ratio is relatively low. An increasing proportion
of cases killed themselves by jumping from heights. Compared to that
reported in the West, suicidal youngsters in Hong Kong have less substance
abuse problems. However, the problem is still over-represented in
the suicidal population.
At a macroscopic level, there are evidences suggesting suicidal youngsters
are not well integrated with the society or they are alienated in
some ways or the other. A significant minority of them are not living
with parents which probably suggest that they have limited family
support. As a group, they have a much higher unemployment rate than
their peers.
Despite the growing interests in the development and evaluation of
prevention efforts in youth suicides in the West, relatively little
is known if they are truely effective and how applicable are they
in the local settings. These programs may include the training of
front-line workers to recognize and assess at risk youths, school-based
prevention programs, health screening, peer support programs, hotline
service, coordinated strategies to prevent suicide clusters, effective
treatment of those mentally disturbed, and restricted access to suicidal
means.
Discussion
and Recommendations
Compared with the West, there are shared and non-shared psychosocial
factors behind youth suicides in Hong Kong. Suicide is best to be
conceptualized as the tragic endpoint of a number of vulnerabilities
(e.g. mental illness) interacting with some precipitating crisis (e.g.
interpersonal conflicts) rather than as a simple reaction to stress
(e.g. they kill themselves because their parent scold them). Some
of the specific characteristics of youth suicides in the local scene
can be explained by a differential distribution of risk factors. Hong
Kong has a lower prevalence of some of these risk factors (e.g. family
disintegration, unemployment, drug abuse), yet they are over-represented
in the suicide population and operate in the same direction. In the
near future, there are worrying trends that these risk factors may
get worse and so will youth suicide. Some of the characteristics (e.g.
sex ratio) remain beyond our understanding.
Little is known if prevention efforts in the West can be adopted locally
in a feasible, systematic, and coordinated manner. Obviously, the
acid test is whether these prevention efforts can genuinely decrease
youth suicide rates in Hong Kong. Thus the evaluations of any prevention
strategies are of paramount importance. Based on the researches and
experiences in the West and the limited local data, we believe it
is important to develop a multi-disciplinary and coordinated policy,
This should include :
systematic data collection,
support front-line workers and build up referral network,
systematic application of school-based suicide prevention programs,
strategies to reach at risk groups,
coherent approaches to counteract deleterious effects of exposure
to suicides, and provide
effective service*-s to those youngsters who are mentally disturbed,
express suicide ideas and even attempts.
The early loss of life through suicide is not only a personal tragedy.
To the society, it is a loss of productive force. To the family, it
is a devastating experience. To the peers, it brings along adverse
impact and may trigger imitative suicide cluster. It is our wish that
this monograph may stimulate more local research and therefore broaden
our understandings on this complex phenomenon. Instead of knee-jerk
responses to every case of widely publicized youth suicides, it is
important to translate what we have already known into what we can
do to prevent it from happening.
|